Why the study?
To evaluate imaging time-series EEG data using Gramian Angular Summation Field to diagnose epilepsy via Deep Neural Networks.
Can Deep Neural Networks classify EEG signals transformed into GASF images for epilepsy diagnosis?
Can Deep Neural Networks classify EEG signals transformed into GASF images for epilepsy diagnosis?
Deep Learning methods using GASF images transformed from EEG signals can effectively detect epilepsy, achieving high precision and recall.
May facilitate automated epilepsy detection from EEG; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
This paper evaluates the approach of imaging timeseries data such as EEG in the diagnosis of epilepsy through Deep Neural Network (DNN). EEG signal is transformed into an RGB image using Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF). Many such EEG epochs are transformed into GASF images for the normal and focal EEG signals. Then, some of the widely used Deep Neural Networks for image classification problems are used here to detect the focal GASF images. Three pre-trained DNN such as the AlexNet, VGG16, and VGG19 are validated for epilepsy detection based on the transfer learning approach. Furthermore, the textural features are extracted from GASF images, and prominent features are selected for a multilayer Artificial Neural Network (ANN) classifier. Lastly, a Custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with three CNN layers, Batch Normalization, Max-pooling layer, and Dense layers, is proposed for epilepsy diagnosis from GASF images. The results of this paper show that the Custom CNN model was able to discriminate against the focal and normal GASF images with an average peak Precision of 0.885, Recall of 0.92, and F1-score of 0.90. Moreover, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve is 0.92 for the Custom CNN model. This paper suggests that Deep Learning methods widely used in image classification problems can be an alternative approach for epilepsy detection from EEG signals through GASF images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parvathavarthini et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: