Why the study?
Does pre-stroke treatment with DOACs compared to VKAs alter the clinical presentation and outcomes of acute ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does pre-stroke treatment with DOACs compared to VKAs alter the clinical presentation and outcomes of acute ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with atrial fibrillation who experience an acute ischemic stroke, prior treatment with DOACs is associated with milder presentations (more TIAs), less symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, and shorter hospital stays compared to prior VKA treatment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) previously treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) according to the type of OAC prescribed. Also, to analyze the outcomes of the patients and the therapeutic approach adopted by the neurologist in the acute phase and for secondary prevention. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, observational study based on prospective registries. We included patients with AF treated with OACs admitted for AIS over a 1-year period. Detailed clinical data and functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score) were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to their pre-AIS anticoagulant therapy: vitamin K antagonists (AIS-VKA) and direct-acting OACs (AIS-DOAC). RESULTS: We recruited 1240 patients (80.4% AIS-VKA and 19.6% AIS-DOAC). In the AIS-DOAC group, transient ischaemic attack was more frequent (18.1% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.001), symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation was less frequent (1.6% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.035) and hospital stay was shorter (median 6 vs. 7 days; P = 0.03). Intravenous thrombolysis was more commonly used in AIS-VKA (9.2% vs. 1.6%; P < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups with respect to mechanical thrombectomy, mortality and modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months. At 3 months, 54% of patients required a DOAC as antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF treated with DOACs who experienced AIS more frequently had transient symptoms (transient ischaemic attack), less symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and a shorter mean stay than those treated with VKAs. Most patients who had been previously anticoagulated with AIS received long-term treatment with DOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zapata-Wainberg et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: