Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many scholar's have commented upon the tendency for human decision-making to be subject to shifting coalitions. Madison, among others, noted that this could lead to instability. This paper suggests that there is a biological basis to this propensity. Two case studies of "chimpanzee politics" are examined; both indicate that chimpanzee coalition behavior seems to be underlaid by a kind of cost-benefit calculus. Since chimpanzees are humans' closest relatives, this implies the possibility that human coalition behavior has an evolutionary basis. Implications for human politics are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: