Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Kinetics of non-isothermal crystallization of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/nucleating agent blends was studied for the nucleation mechanism. Avrami, Jeziorny, and correctional Friedman methods were applied to analyze the non-isothermal crystallization of the iPP/aryl heterocylic aluminum phosphate/sodium laurate (iPP/AHP-Al/L-Na) blends. For a given cooling rate of 10°C min −1 , the onset temperature ( T o ) and crystallization temperature ( T c ) of the iPP/AHP-Al/L-Na blends increased by 4.19°C and 3.57°C, respectively, compared to iPP/L-Na. The T o and T c of iPP/AHP-Al/L-Na blends increased by 2.13°C and 1.79°C, respectively, compared to iPP/AHP-Al, when the AHP-Al mass fraction reached 1.2‰. The effective activation barrier (Δ E) for non-isothermal crystallization was the least when the AHP-Al mass fraction was 0.8‰. The value of the initial slope of the exotherm increased with the addition of AHP-Al monotonically. All these findings indicated that AHP-Al could improve the initial crystallization rate and also that the addition of AHP-Al/L-Na reduced the Δ E for non-isothermal crystallization. It is speculated that an ion exchange reaction between AHP-Al and L-Na occurs during the mixing process and could be possible that this results in the generation of a more efficient nucleating agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: