In this article, I focus on artificial intelligence (AI) in a social science futures research agenda. This agenda is proposed in response to a contemporary context where global future uncertainties are generating a futures knowledge market increasingly populated by the promise of faster and scaled-up AI foresight. Acknowledging the possibilities offered by technological and interactional focuses in developing AI methods, I turn to reflexively discuss the “side effects” of using AI methods in qualitative futures-focused team research. Bringing this perspective together with those of AI foresighting and technical elements of AI methods, I examine the role of Generative AI (Gen AI) and AI as an anticipatory infrastructure through which international organizations imagine possible futures and possible foresight solutions; research participants can critically engage with dominant futures visions; and researchers imagine future research methods and their applications in the social sciences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Pink (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: