Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A geodynamo model is studied of so-called “intermediate type”, in which the dynamical effects of the Lorentz force in generating meridional circulation, magnetic wind, and geostrophic flow are included, but in which the α-effect and the thermal wind are regarded as given. The core is supposed to be coupled weakly to the mantle through viscosity. The resulting nonlinear αω-dynamo was integrated for a range of different α-strengths, with a fixed thermal wind and for two different strengths of core-mantle coupling. Three regimes of behavior were isolated. For large α-effect, the geostrophic motion dominates the core flow, leading to solutions of model-Z form (Braginsky, 1975), For small α, the thermal wind is large compared with the magnetic wind and the geostrophic flow; the meridional motions are small. The dynamo here conforms more to Taylor's (1963) concept, according to which core-mantle coupling is unimportant; the solution for the two strengths of viscous coupling are almost the same. In this regime the dynamo operates subcritically i.e. at α-strengths smaller than that at which an infinitesimal field can be maintained according to kinematic theory. Between these two regimes lies a third regime in which a local optimal dynamo activity occurs, and in which the dipole moment and magnetic energy have local maxima.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Roberts (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: