Points out that changing management information systems (MIS) is a dangerous and complex process, for which business executives are not qualified. Adds that not changing is just as bad. Discusses the differences between a fundamental change of architecture and conventional systems development. Recommends consideration of three questions: is it really necessary to reconfigure core systems architecture? How can flexibility be built in? What approach to implementation? Observes that to date (1989) few firms have satisfactorily addressed the problems raised by antiquated core architectures. Concludes that reconfiguration efforts must be congruent with company strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossman et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: