Why the study?
Does admission glucose or HbA1c better predict mortality in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes?
Does admission glucose or HbA1c better predict mortality in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes?
Elevated admission glucose is a stronger predictor of mortality than prior long-term abnormal glucose metabolism (HbA1c) in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support admission glucose for acute risk stratification in suspected ACS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Admission hyperglycaemia is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether hyperglycaemia is more important than prior long-term glucose metabolism, is unknown. AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of admission glucose and HbA(1c) levels in patients with ACS. METHODS: We measured glucose and HbA(1c) at admission in 521 consecutive patients with suspected ACS. Glucose was categorized as <7.8 (n = 305), 7.8-11.0 (n = 138) or > or =11.1 mmol/l (n = 78); HbA(1c) as <6.2% (n = 420) or > or =6.2% (n = 101). Mean follow-up was 1.6 +/- 0.5 years. RESULTS: The diagnosis of ACS was confirmed in 332 patients (64%), leaving 189 (36%) with atypical chest pain. In ACS patients, mortality by glucose category (<7.8, 7.8-11.0 or > or =11.1 mmol) was 9%, 8% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.001); mortality by HbA(1c) category (<6.2% vs. > or =6.2%) was 10% vs. 17%, respectively (p = 0.14). On multivariate analysis, glucose category was significantly associated with mortality (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.3), but HbA(1c) category was not (HR 1.5, 95%CI 0.6-4.2). DISCUSSION: Elevated admission glucose appears more important than prior long-term abnormal glucose metabolism in predicting mortality in patients with suspected ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorik R. Timmer (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: