Security analysis demonstrates post-separation non-transferability in browser environments, indicating that distributed client keys and remote monotonic state prevent session continuation.
Public browser applications expose their client software to adversarial inspection and execution. A non-exportable browser key prevents direct key export but remains a stateless signing oracle under control of the page. A remote service can maintain monotonic state, consume nonces, serialize transitions, and revoke sessions, but cannot alone establish continuing possession of a particular browser-held key. This work defines a Remote-State-Welded Capability (RSWC), a distributed capability in which a client-held non-exportable signing key and authoritative remote monotonic state are jointly necessary for every accepted transition. It further defines Post-Separation Non-Transferability (PSNT): after an adversary loses access to the original signing oracle, copied code, storage, transcripts, and previously obtained signatures do not enable a fresh accepted transition. The control-plane construction uses canonical transcript commitments, unpredictable single-use challenges, atomic compare-and-swap state transitions, epochs, and lease-aware reconnection. Under signature unforgeability, challenge unpredictability, collision resistance, and atomic server state, a post-separation continuation reduces to a signature forgery, challenge prediction, hash collision, or violation of the compare-and-swap invariant. For real-time streams, the work defines a deployable Signed Serial Block Chain using a non-exportable sign-only ECDSA key. It provides Per-Block Oracle Dependence while explicitly not claiming microphone provenance, trusted-pipeline transit, Sybil resistance, or relay prevention. The central result: a browser-held key and remote monotonic state can be welded into a capability that cannot be independently continued after separation, while a serial block chain can require continuing adaptive access to the live signing oracle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Connor Etherington (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: