Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative cross-national study reveals that AI personalization influences purchase intention through trust and ad relevance in social media users, highlighting trust as a key behavioral lever.
AI-driven personalization has become a defining feature of digital advertising, yet whether it drives purchase intention directly or depends on other underlying mechanisms remains insufficiently understood, particularly in under-studied emerging markets. This study investigates how perceived relevance, usefulness, and privacy concerns shape perceived trust and purchase intention in response to AI-driven personalized advertising across Lebanon and Türkiye, two digitally distinct markets. Drawing on the Stimulus Organism Response model, Technology Acceptance Model, Privacy Calculus Theory, and Trust in Automation Theory, a quantitative cross-national design was employed, using a structured questionnaire administered to 802 social media users (394 Lebanon; 408 Türkiye), with data analyzed through partial least squares structural equation modeling and permutation-based multigroup analysis following partial measurement invariance. Results confirm perceived personalization has no direct effect on purchase intention, operating solely through relevance, usefulness, and privacy concerns; relevance and usefulness build trust while privacy concerns erode it, and trust, relevance, and usefulness each independently drive purchase intention. This study advances an asymmetric mediation account of AI advertising, positioning trust as the conduit through which privacy risk reaches behavior and, for managers, the lever converting personalization into purchase. Future research could examine these dynamics longitudinally or across other digitally emerging markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: