Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation reveals privacy vulnerabilities in split learning language models, demonstrating that smashed data leaks private webpage text during phishing detection.
Phishing attacks via desktops, smartphones and internet of things devices are becoming increasingly sophisticated, posing critical security challenges for digital infrastructures. Defending against these attacks requires AI-based detection models that maintain high accuracy, since false positives or negatives can lead to severe breaches, while remaining lightweight enough to run on resource-constrained client devices. Split Learning (SL) meets these requirements by having clients compute only initial model layers locally and transmit intermediate activations (“smashed data”) to a server for the remaining inference, avoiding direct sharing of raw inputs. However, prior work in the image domain has shown that smashed data can leak original content, suggesting that SL may not be safe for user privacy. Therefore, it is essential to investigate whether these privacy risks also extend to language-model–based SL systems, which have fundamentally different neural network architectures, including attention mechanism. This paper introduces the Semantic Information Reconstruction Attack (SIRA), a novel framework designed to infer sensitive semantic elements directly from smashed data by leveraging the generative capabilities of large language models. In experiments on real-world phishing datasets, SIRA outperforms conventional reconstruction attacks in accurately inferring private webpage information. These findings reveal a potential privacy vulnerability in SL-based language models for security applications and motivate the development of targeted defense strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: