Theoretical analysis demonstrates rough ideal-convergent sequences can fail to be rough ideal-Cauchy in asymmetric metric spaces, resolving an open problem regarding topological metrizability.
This study builds on the research by Collins et al. [Topology Appl. 154 (2007) 2312-2322], Aytar [Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. {29} (3-4) (2008) 291-303] and Kostyrko et al. [Real Anal. Exchange {26} (2) (2000/2001) 669-686] to introduce the concepts of forward (resp. backward) rough I-convergence, as well as forward (resp. backward) rough I-Cauchy sequences, in asymmetric metric spaces. In this context, we would like to emphasize the following points:[(i):] A forward (resp. backward) rough I-convergent sequence may not necessarily be a forward (resp. backward) rough I-Cauchy sequence.[(ii):] We address an open problem proposed by Das et al. [Page-561, Math. Slovaca, 63 (3), 2013, 545-562].Simultaneously, we introduce forward (resp. backward) rough I-limit points, as well as forward (resp. backward) rough I-cluster points, within the context of asymmetric metric spaces to characterize an ideal and the metrizability of asymmetric metric spaces. Furthermore, we demonstrate the non-existence of any sequence x=ₙ\ₙ for which a forward (resp. backward) closed set F does not coincide with the forward (resp. backward) rough I-cluster point set of that sequence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mandal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: