Theoretical framework demonstrates conditional validity limits across quantum computing claims, highlighting energy exchange rates and structural seams where computational paradigms break down.
Why a reader should care: this paper turns every quantum-computing innovation and practical-application claim into a conditional truth with an explicit locale, then pairs each claim with the exact QPL 2026 paper that documents where it breaks. One table (the seams catalog T1-T8) replaces a year of vendor roadmaps: claims are conditional truths, the seams are public, and the energy exchange rate between paradigms is the currency. Premise-depth disclosure: the framework's unanalyzable primitives are 'locale' and 'interface' (imported from the companion record, Conditional Truths and the Locale Framework, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21983324); the ontic structural realism reading is a named imported input (Ladyman-Ross), not derived; the energy exchange-rate theorems (Maltesson et al., arXiv:2510.08546; Brenner-Dias-Koenig, arXiv:2509.18854) are imported external results; the seams catalog is retrodictive with capped evidential weight; the paper claims no dynamical theory of seams. The four moves of the locale framework (C1 locale-conditionality, C2 map-territory, C3 rendering-interface underdetermination, C4 scale primitives) are instantiated in the practitioner domain, with joules-per-solution as the composite scale primitive and the Bruhat-Tits building structure inside Clifford+R exact synthesis (arXiv:2510.11526) as the C3 structure leak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: