Critical review demonstrates potential net harm from tuberculosis preventive therapy in drug-resistant settings, highlighting urgent ethical and scientific concerns.
The assumption that anti-TB drugs function purely as bactericidal agents, with immune function as a passive benefit, reflects neither the known pharmacology of these compounds nor the dynamic biology of the latent state. Together, these realities invoke the oldest and most fundamental principle of medical ethics: primum non nocere; first, do no harm. It is the argument of this paper that TPT, as currently deployed in high-resistance settings, may, in a biologically definable and clinically significant subset of patients, cause measurable net harm and that this possibility has not been given the scientific or ethical weight it deserves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sunil Kumar Raina (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: