Theoretical framework outlines a typed relational architecture for physical laws and cross-scale dynamics, establishing formal requirements for quantum and gravitational recovery.
MKUFT is an evolving research programme for analysing how possibility, relational constraint, physical dynamics, measurement, history, and scale-specific description fit together. This publication presents the current principal MKUFT architecture: a typed S–I–P–O framework in which addressed state and context determine admissibility, an active physical-law object is assembled, physical propagation and measurement produce outcomes, and the realised path readdresses the next effective possibility space. The framework distinguishes functional identity, constitutive closure, law sufficiency, capability, cost, and recoverability across scale, with explicit strongest-fair-null, deformation, falsification, Bell/no-signalling, quantum-recovery, gravitational-recovery, and energy-accounting requirements. It is not presented as a completed unified field theory or accepted physics, but as a pressure-testable relational architecture with explicit boundaries between established results, research scaffolds, and unresolved foundational claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Charles McLaughlin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: