We investigate the influence of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) on the optoelectronic properties of polymer light-emitting diodes containing poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene) (PFO). Electromodulation and $IV$ luminance measurements are reported for a series of devices with bare indium tin oxide (ITO) or PEDOT:PSS-coated ITO anodes and Ba or Al cathodes. The ITO/PFO/Al, ITO/PFO/Ba, and ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PFO/Al devices all exhibit conventional field-induced electromodulation behavior, in both forward and reverse bias, consistent with the Stark effect (SE). The ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PFO/Ba devices by contrast exhibit conventional behavior only for applied biases below the flat-band voltage; at higher biases, the field-induced SE features vanish and are replaced by anomalous charge-induced electromodulation features. This anomalous behavior is observed only when PEDOT:PSS is used in conjunction with a strongly electron-injecting cathode such as Ba, and is attributed to the presence of trapped electrons at the PEDOT:PSS-emitter interface, which screen the electric field from the bulk of the device. The enhanced field at the interface increases the rate of field-assisted hole injection into the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of the PFO, resulting in lower drive voltages and increased electroluminescence efficiencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brewer et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: