Why the study?
Does a combination of inflammation and calcification markers improve mortality and cardiovascular risk stratification in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients?
Does a combination of inflammation and calcification markers improve mortality and cardiovascular risk stratification in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients?
A composite of inflammation and calcification markers effectively stratifies long-term mortality and cardiovascular risk in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients.
Marker combination stratifies mortality and CVE risk in peritoneal dialysis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: It remains unknown whether a composite of inflammation and calcification markers provides better mortality and cardiovascular risk stratification in chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: We performed a 4-year prospective follow-up study in 231 chronic PD patients from a single regional dialysis centre in Hong Kong. Valvular calcification was detected using echocardiography, and fasting venous blood was collected to measure a panel of inflammation markers. The patients were stratified into five groups on the basis of 0, 1, 2, 3 and all 4 inflammation and calcification risk markers, namely high C-reactive protein (CRP) (CRP in upper tertile), high interleukin-6 (IL-6) (IL-6 in upper tertile), low fetuin-A (fetuin-A in lower tertile) and valvular calcification. Study outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and fatal or non-fatal cardiovascular events (CVEs). RESULTS: The patients with 4, 3, 2 and 1 markers had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 5.17 (95% CI, 1.81-14.77, P = 0.002), 3.38 (95% CI, 1.50-7.60; P = 0.003), 2.17 (95% CI, 0.98-4.77; P = 0.056) and 2.42 (95% CI, 1.18-4.96; P = 0.016), respectively, for mortality at 4 years than those with 0 risk marker. The adjusted HRs for fatal or non-fatal CVEs were 4.33 (95% CI, 1.70-11.03; P = 0.002), 1.60 (95% CI, 0.73-3.52; P = 0.24), 1.92 (95% CI, 0.95-3.90; P = 0.07) and 1.33 (95% CI, 0.67-2.62; P = 0.42), respectively, for patients with 4, 3, 2 and 1 markers than those with 0 risk markers. CONCLUSIONS: A composite of inflammation and calcification markers provides long-term prognostication and identifies the sickest PD patients with the worst clinical outcomes. Since these parameters can all be obtained quite readily, our data support the adoption of a multiinflammation and calcification risk marker approach for mortality and cardiovascular risk stratification in PD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: