Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The compound 4′,4‴-bis(ferrocenyl)-2,2′ : 6′,2″ : 6″,2‴ : 6‴ : 2â�—-quinquepyridine (L) has been prepared in two steps from ferrocenecarbaldehyde and 2,6-diacetylpyridine and its co-ordination behaviour investigated. Reaction with cobalt(II) and iron(II) salts gives the seven-co-ordinate complexes [ML(H2O)2][PF6]2(M = Co or Fe). The presence of ferrocenyl groups in the ligand appears not to present a steric barrier to the formation of helicates, and the double-helical complexes [Ni2L2(H2O)2][PF6]4, and [Cu2L2][PF6]3 can be obtained by reaction with nickel(II) and copper(II) salts respectively. The compound L reacts with [RuCl3L′](L′= 2,2′ : 6′,2″-terpyridine or its 4′-dimethylamino, -methylsulfonyl or -ferrocenyl derivatives) to give the heteroleptic ruthenium(II) complexes [RuL(L′)][PF6]2. In these complexes L is acting as a tridentate hypodentate ligand leaving a non-co-ordinated didentate 2,2′-bipyridyl moiety. The latter may act as a didentate domain for an additional ruthenium centre, and the tetranuclear complexes [L′RuLRuCl(L′)][PF6]3 with two ruthenium(II) centres in two different, N6 and N5Cl, donor environments have been prepared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Constable et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: