Why the study?
Does activated clotting time (ACT) accurately estimate heparin concentration compared to anti-Xa assay in adult cardiopulmonary bypass patients?
Does activated clotting time (ACT) accurately estimate heparin concentration compared to anti-Xa assay in adult cardiopulmonary bypass patients?
ACT monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass significantly overestimates heparin concentration compared to anti-Xa assays, highlighting the need to account for artificial prolongation and individual sensitivities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ACT heparin estimates may overestimate dosing on bypass; leaves open whether anti-Xa monitoring improves outcomes in cardiopulmonary bypass.
Activated clotting time (ACT) values were converted to heparin concentration, enabling an assessment of the accuracy of the ACT and a quantification of the prolongation imposed by bypass. Blood samples were obtained from 42 adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients before and during bypass surgery. Samples were analysed for ACT (HemoTec ACT) and anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) plasma heparin concentration. The mean heparin concentration calculated before bypass was an accurate reflection of plasma heparin; however, calculated values rose to around 170% of anti-Xa values upon connection to bypass. By adjusting for this rise, for 95% of cases the calculated heparin concentration would vary between 0.60 and 1.65 times anti-Xa values. Without accounting for artificial prolongation or individual sensitivities, the ACT may give values between 0.8 and 3.0 times that indicated by the anti-Xa assay. When both individual heparin sensitivities and the effects of bypass are considered, the ACT may provide a more suitable indication of heparin levels; however, typical use may overestimate heparin up to threefold.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raymond et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: