The four-coordinate anion Cu I (dpym) 2 − (Hdpym = 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl-4,4′-dicarboethoxydipyrromethene) can be prepared in solution in acetone either by electrochemical reduction of the known tetrahedral complex Cu II (dpym) 2 0 (E 0 = −290 mV vs. SCE) or by the quantitative reaction of 2Hdpym with Cu(CH 3 CN) 4 + in the absence of O 2 . The latter reaction does not go to completion in solvents that bind relatively strongly to Cu I or that are poor proton acceptors. Ligand exchange between Cu I (dpym) 2 − excess Hdpym in acetone is "fast" in the 1 H NMR timeframe, with k 1 = 1.4 × 10 7 L mol −1 s −1 at 298 K (first order in each reactant), ΔH ‡ 1 = 3.4 ± 0.6 kJ mol −1 , and ΔS ‡ 1 = −97 ± 3 J K −1 mol −1 . In the absence of excess Hdpym, dissociation of Cu I (dpym) 2 − in acetone remains negligible. Homogeneous electron exchange between Cu I (dpym) 2 − and Cu II (dpym) 2 0 in acetone falls in the "slow" 1 H NMR timeframe, with k ex = 5.9 × 10 3 L mol −1 s −1 , ΔH ‡ ex = 48.5 ± 3.0 kJ mol −1 , and ΔS ‡ ex = −10 ± 10 J K −1 , at ionic strength I ≈ 0.007 mol L −1 and 298 K, while for the same self-exchange on a Pt electrode the heterogeneous rate constant k el = 0.16±0.04 cm s −1 at I ≈ 0.1 mol −1 L −1 and 298 K, according to AC voltammetry. These values of K ex and K el are of the order expected for Cu II/I couples in which no significant change in coordination number or geometry accompanies electron transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metelski et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: