Key result
Pace-mapping delays >80 ms identify VT re-entry targets ~79% more often than shorter delays.
Why the study?
Areas of slow conduction and block in old infarcts cause re-entrant VT, but the relationship between conduction delays detected by pace-mapping and VT re-entry circuit isthmuses remained to be characterized.
Does pace-mapping to detect slow conduction identify VT re-entry circuit isthmuses in patients with post-infarction VT?
Observational (n=12)
Does pace-mapping to detect slow conduction identify VT re-entry circuit isthmuses in patients with post-infarction VT?
Absolute Event Rate: 52% vs 29%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Identification of abnormal conduction during pace-mapping can focus mapping during induced VT to discrete regions of the infarct, potentially aiding ablation strategies.
Brunckhorst et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia after infarction (n=12). Marked conduction delays (>80 ms) during pace-mapping vs. Conduction delays of 40 to 80 ms was evaluated on Location within a target region (re-entry circuit isthmus) (p=< 0.0001). Marked conduction delays >80 ms during pace-mapping were more often located in VT re-entry circuit target regions than delays of 40 to 80 ms (52% vs 29%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: