Key result
Personalized perioperative pain management tailors multimodal pharmacological regimens, regional anesthesia, and digital monitoring to individual patient characteristics to optimize functional recovery.
Why the study?
Although interest in opioid-free techniques has grown, evidence does not demonstrate superiority over opioid-sparing approaches, highlighting the need for personalized pain management tailored to individual characteristics.
Perioperative pain management is shifting from standardized protocols to individualized, patient-centered strategies that integrate multimodal analgesia, regional anesthesia, and digital monitoring to optimize recovery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Individualized perioperative analgesia may curb short-term complications; leaves open optimal multimodal regimens for prospective trials.
Perioperative pain management has shifted from standardized, procedure-based protocols toward individualized, patient-centered approaches. Inadequate pain control can result in short-term adverse outcomes, including delayed ambulation, prolonged hospitalization, and increased complications, as well as long-term sequelae such as chronic persistent postsurgical pain. Early models of preemptive and preventive analgesia emphasized pain relief primarily through the use of opioids. Growing concern about opioid-related adverse effects established the basis for multimodal and opioid-sparing strategies. Nevertheless, with the onset of the global opioid crisis, heightened awareness of the risks of opioid overuse has fueled interest in opioid-free techniques. However, evidence does not demonstrate that opioid-free methods are superior to opioid-sparing approaches. This underscores the importance of returning to the central goals of enhanced recovery after surgery: early restoration of function and reduction of complications. Within this framework, personalized pain management has emerged as a practical paradigm that tailors interventions to individual characteristics, including comorbidities, psychological status, pain sensitivity, and recovery objectives. This review outlines the rationale, current practices, and future directions of personalized perioperative pain management and proposes a framework for integrating new strategies into clinical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyun Kang (2025) conducted a review in Perioperative pain. Personalized perioperative pain management vs. Standardized, procedure-based protocols was evaluated. Personalized perioperative pain management tailors multimodal pharmacological regimens, regional anesthesia, and digital monitoring to individual patient characteristics to optimize functional recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: