Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study shows significant training gaps in advanced cardiovascular imaging among cardiology fellows, highlighting the need for standardized national training guidelines.
BACKGROUND: The Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS) guidelines, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) emphasize competency-based training and establish milestones to be met during cardiology training. However, India lacks such guidelines for training cardiology fellows. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the self-declared competencies of cardiology fellows across multiple preselected domains as per the COCATS-4 recommendations. METHODS: The study was conducted at three premier institutions across India between June 2022 and December 2024. A total of 52 cardiology fellows who had recently completed their 3-year core cardiology training course were included in the study. These candidates completed a questionnaire that included a checklist assessing different levels of competency in various preselected aspects of cardiovascular medicine. Candidates were also asked about their awareness of COCATS-4 standards and cardiology training in India. RESULTS: While all trainees reported Level 1 competency in cardiac catheterization, heart failure, and adult congenital heart disease, a significantly lower percentage of trainees achieved Level 1 competency in nuclear medicine (1.9 %), cardiac MRI (3.8 %), and cardiac CT (17.3 %). At Level 2, cardiac catheterization (73.1 %) and echocardiography (63.5 %) had the highest self-declared competencies, whereas nuclear medicine (3.8 %), cardiac MRI (0 %), and cardiac CT (0 %) had the lowest. Only 23.1 % of trainees were aware of COCATS-4, and 82.7 % believed that standardized guidelines would improve cardiology training in India. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize the wide variability in self-reported competencies of cardiology trainees across India and highlight the deficiencies in certain core areas like cardiovascular imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gawalkar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: