Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three strategies for incorporation of [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– into polyaniline (PANI)-coated electrodes have been investigated: A, ion-exchange of [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– into pre-formed PANI-Cl- or PANI-SO4-coated electrodes; B, electropolymerisation of aniline from acidified K4[Fe(CN)6] or K3[Fe(CN)6]; and C, electropolymerisation of aniline from H4[Fe(CN)6]. Method A led to observable ion exchange into PANI-Cl or PANI-SO4 with acidified K4[Fe(CN)6] or K3[Fe(CN)6] solutions. The amount of film-confined [Fe(CN)6]3– corresponds to protonation of ca. 19% of the N atoms in PANI, but the response is not long-lived in hexacyanoferrate(III)-free electrolyte; a partition equilibrium constant of 220 ± 50 is measured. Method B effected [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– incorporation, but only when high concentrations of redox anion were present during PANI growth. The potential of the [Fe(CN)6]3–/4– couple in the polymer is shifted to +0.32 V (ΔEp= 40 mV) for PANI-[Fe(CN)6]3– compared with the standard potential +0.36 V vs. SCE in solution (at a freshly polished glassy carbon electrode). The oxidized form of the redox couple PANI-[Fe(CN)6]3– has a time-dependent voltammogram which collapses to a single broad wave at +0.32 V (ΔEp= 30 mV). The results also show that [Fe(CN)6]4– is exchanged more rapidly when the electrode potential of the film is cycled in HCl rather than in H2SO4, owing to ion-size considerations. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis on the PANI-[Fe(CN)6] films revealed a fibrous morphology indicative of a slower rate of growth than PANI-Cl. Method C also led to successful incorporation of [Fe(CN)6]3–/4–, whose presence was confirmed by fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rourke et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: