Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We previously demonstrated that human platelets bind a small number of thrombin molecules with high affinity and a larger number with relatively lower affinity (Tollefsen, D. M., Feagler, J. R., and Majerus, P. W. (1974), J. Biol. Chem. 249, 2646). In the present report, equilibrium binding studies using [125I]DIP-thrombin (diisopropylphosphoryl-thrombin) over the range of 0.0002-10 U/ml yield a Hill coefficient of 0.775. Measurements of the rate of dissociation of [125I]DIP-thrombin bound to platelets at relatively high affinity (0.04 U/ml added) indicate a much faster dissociation in the presence of 14 U/ml unlabeled DIP-thrombin (T 1/2 = 1.0 min) than in its absence (T 1/2 - 140 min). [125I]DIP-thrombin bound at low affinity (1.0U/ml added) dissociates from platelets with a T 1/2 = 1.7 min in the absence of unlabeled DIP-thrombin. These results suggest a negative cooperative interaction among receptor sites for thrombin; i.e., as thrombin binds to unoccupied sites, high-affinity receptors are apparently converted to low-affinity receptors. In an attempt to detect whether there is heterogeneity of thrombin receptors, [125I]DIP-thrombin was covalently cross-linked to intact platelets using 1 mM glutaraldehyde. A single complex (apparent molecular weight, 200 000) containing [125I]DIP-thrombin was formed throughout a range of thrombin concentrations in which both high- and low-affinity binding was observed. Since incorporation of [125I]DIP-thrombin into this complex did not occur in the absence of platelets and was inhibited by unlabeled thrombin, the complex may represent thrombin cross-linked to its receptor. We conclude that a single class of receptor sites can account for both high- and low-affinity binding of thrombin to platelets, although interaction between nonidentical sites cannot be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tollefsen et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: