Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Studies made on low‐hafnium‐content ZrO 2 , show that the monoclinic‐tetragonal inversion temperature is 1170°C., and it is raised to approximately 1190°C. in the “natural” ZrO 2 , which contains approximately 2% HfO 2 . No explanation could be found for the knownmarked hysteresis during cooling, when the reverse polymorphic transformation takes dace at 1040°C. In the system ZrO 2 ‐ThO 2 the monoclinic‐tetragonal ZrO 2 , inversion temperature is lowered to 1000°C., although the maximum solid solution extent of ZrO 2 , in Thon and vice versa is approximately only 2% at this temperature. Below about 400°C. under hydrothermal conditions it was possible to prepare a continuous, although metastable series of solid solutions with the fluorite structurewith compositions varying from ThO 2 , to nearly pure ZrO 2 . Contrary to earlier work only 8 mole ZrO 2 , dissolves in UO 2 and less than 4 mole of UO, in ZrO 2 at temperatures up to 13OO0C. A continuous series of solid solutions could be made between Th 2 and UO 2 at 13OO°C., and extensive defect fluorite solid solutions could be prepared between Tho 2 and U 3 O 8 ; there is some evidence for exsolution into uranium‐rich and thorium‐rich members at low temperatures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mumpton et al. (1960) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: