Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A 3-yr field study was conducted in 1997, 1998, and 1999 at Stoneville, Mississippi, to study the effects of soybean planted in 19-cm (narrow) rows/high density (NR-HD) as compared to 57-cm (medium) rows/medium density (MR-MD) and 95-cm (wide) rows/low density (WR-LD) on weed control, yield, and net return under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems with preemergence (PRE) only, postemergence (POST) only, or PRE + POST herbicide programs. Control of eight major weeds was at least 82% regardless of planting system. Soybean planted in NR-HD system resulted in 65% and 78% less total weed biomass as compared to soybean in MR-MD and WR-LD system, respectively, 10 wk after planting. Soybean planted in NR-HD system produced 8% and 27% higher yield compared to soybean planted in MR-MD and WR-LD system, respectively. Net returns were similar between NR-HD and MR-MD systems ($151 to 159/ha), but were higher than in WR-LD system ($106/ha). With the exception of yellow nutsedge, control of all weed species studied was 90% or better regardless of herbicide program. Control of yellow nutsedge ranged from 85% to 91% among herbicide programs. Overall, total weed biomass was lower with PRE + POST (520 kg/ha) as compared to a PRE (1460 kg/ha) or POST (1450 kg/ha) only program. The PRE + POST program gave higher soybean yield (2100 kg/ha) and the yield reduction was 9% to 10% with either a PRE only or POST only program. Net returns were lowest from the PRE + POST ($112/ha) program as compared to PRE only ($153/ha) or POST only ($138/ha) program. Weed control, total weed biomass, and soybean yield were similar for CT and NT systems. This research showed that yield advantage of NR-HD system was partly due to improved weed control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishna N. Reddy (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: