Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical benefits of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) over multi-detector row CT (MDCT) in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. METHODS: FDG-PET/CT and MDCT were performed on 78 patients with gastric cancer pathologically diagnosed by endoscopy. The accuracy of radiologic staging retrospectively was compared to pathologic result after curative resection. RESULTS: Primary tumors were detected in 51 (65.4%) patients with (18)F-FDG-PET/CT, and 47 (60.3%) patients with MDCT. Regarding detection of lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT was 51.5% with an accuracy of 71.8%, whereas those of MDCT were 69.7% and 69.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for a primary tumor with signet ring cell carcinoma was lower than that of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for a primary tumor with non-signet ring cell carcinoma (35.3% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Due to its low sensitivity, (18)F-FDG-PET/CT alone shows no definite clinical benefit for prediction of lymph node metastasis in preoperative staging of gastric cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: