Key result
The proposed stacking ensemble model achieved a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 9.679 for predicting daily cardiovascular disease hospital admissions, outperforming the best base learner (Random Forest) by 6.3%.
Why the study?
The rising prevalence of cardiovascular diseases strains medical resources, making accurate forecasting of daily hospital admissions necessary to optimize resource allocation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A stacking ensemble machine learning model incorporating historical admission, meteorological, and air quality data accurately predicts daily cardiovascular hospital admissions, outperforming individual base models.
With lifestyle and environmental changes, the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is trending upwards, putting pressure on the limited medical resources. Accurate forecasting of daily counts of hospital admissions (HAs) for CVDs is helpful to optimize medical resources. In this study, we proposed a stacking ensemble model with direct prediction strategy to predict the daily number of CVDs admissions using HAs data, air pollution data, and meteorological data. The sequential forward floating selection method with early stopping was applied for feature selection. Five machine learning models, including linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), were utilized as base learners to construct the stacking model. We compared the performance of the proposed stacking model with the five base learners in three datasets. The experimental results indicated that our model performed best in three datasets under four evaluation criteria, including mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R2). Particularly, in the CVDs dataset, the MAPE is 15.103 for LR, 11.862 for SVR, 10.571 for XGBoost, 10.378 for GBDT, 10.333 for RF, and 9.679 for the stacking model. Compared with the best base learner RF, the MAPE, RMSE, and MAE of the stacking model decreased by 6.3%, 7.4%, and 6.3%, respectively, and the R2improved by 1.7%. It is evident that the proposed stacking model can effectively forecast the daily number of hospitalizations for CVDs and provide decision support for hospital managers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2020) studied Cardiovascular diseases (n=1,096). Stacking ensemble machine learning model vs. Individual base machine learning models (Random Forest, GBDT, XGBoost, SVR, Linear Regression) was evaluated on Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) for predicting daily hospital admissions for cardiovascular diseases (6.3% decrease). The proposed stacking ensemble model achieved a Mean Absolute Percentage Error of 9.679 for predicting daily cardiovascular disease hospital admissions, outperforming the best base learner (Random Forest) by 6.3%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: