Key result
Cohort study protocol evaluates integrated primary care and public health model for chronic conditions in China.
Why the study?
Does an integrated primary care and public health model improve the proportion of controlled chronic conditions in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or stroke?
Cohort (n=7,200)
Yes
Does an integrated primary care and public health model improve the proportion of controlled chronic conditions in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or stroke?
This protocol outlines a prospective cohort study to evaluate whether integrating primary care and public health improves chronic disease control in China.
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic conditions is increasing. Given that the majority of chronic patients are managed by primary healthcare providers, there is a need to integrate primary care with public health to address the prevailing situation and enhance patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is to establish, implement and evaluate an integrated primary care and public health model in China for patients with chronic conditions. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre and observational study will be conducted at 12 township hospitals on patients (n=7200) diagnosed with chronic conditions (hypertensive, diabetic or stroke). Participants were divided into two groups: pilot areas and mainstream areas follow-up groups. The primary outcome will be the difference in the proportion of controlled chronic conditions among the two groups. Secondary outcomes will be the differences in mean change in diastolic and systolic blood pressures, fasting glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride, death from any cause and participant-reported physical and psychological health status. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. We plan to publish the results of this study in a peer-reviewed journal article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qing et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Chronic conditions (hypertensive, diabetic or stroke) (n=7,200). Integrated primary care and public health model vs. Mainstream areas was evaluated on Difference in the proportion of controlled chronic conditions among the two groups. This study protocol describes a prospective multicentre cohort study to evaluate an integrated primary care and public health model for 7,200 patients with chronic conditions in China.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: