Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The structure and binding of cisplatin to DNA in aqueous solution are investigated via a QM/MM methodology. In our approach, the platinated moiety is treated at the density functional level and the biomolecular frame with the AMBER force field. The calculations are based on X-ray structures of platinated DNA in the free form (cispt-d(CCTCTG*G*TCTCC)-d(GGAGACCAGAGG) [Takahara, et al. Nature 1995, 377, 649−652] 1 ) and in complex with HMG protein domain A (cispt-d(CCUCTCTG*G*ACCTTCC)-d(GGAGAGACCTGGAAGG) [Ohndorf et al. Nature 1999, 399, 708−712] 2 as well as on a cisplatin docked DNA model. During the QM/MM simulation, the structure of the platinated DNA dodecamer rearranges significantly toward structural determinants of the solution structure as obtained by NMR spectroscopy [Gelasco et al. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 9230−9239]. 3 The calculated 195 Pt chemical shifts of the QM/MM structure relative to cisplatin in aqueous solution are in qualitative agreement with the experimental data [Bancroft et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6860−6871. Miller et al. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 2421−2425]. 4,5 The QM/MM structure of the platinated/DNA HMG complex, on the other hand, remains rather similar to the X-ray structure, consistent with its relatively low flexibility. Docking of Pt(NH 3 ) 2 2+ onto DNA in its canonical B-conformation causes a large axis bend and a rearrangement of DNA as experimentally observed in the platinated adducts, with NMR chemical shifts in qualitative agreement with the values in aqueous solution. 4,5
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiegel et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: