Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
InP was amorphized by ion irradiation in two very different regimes: (i) 1850.3em0exMeV Au irradiation, where the energy loss was predominantly via inelastic processes (electronic stopping), or (ii) Se irradiation in an energy range of 0.08--70.3em0exMeV, where elastic processes (nuclear stopping) were dominant. The structural parameters of the amorphous phase were determined for as-irradiated and thermally relaxed samples using extended x-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. Despite the fundamentally different energy transfer mechanisms, no significant difference in the atomic structure of the two amorphized samples was observed. We attribute this result to a common ``melt and quench'' process responsible for amorphization. In fact, the measured structural parameters for the amorphized samples, including the fraction of homopolar In-In bonding, were consistent with simulations of the amorphous phase produced by assuming a quench from the melt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnohr et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: