Empirical analysis demonstrates that full-series training and demand interpolation optimize forecast accuracy under disruptions, suggesting the value of preserving historical trends.
This study examines various forecasting strategies in the presence of a disruption, using Hong Kong tourism demand as a case study. The following strategies consist of (1) developing adaptive models, (2) incorporating a disruption into an adaptive model, (3) interpolating the interrupted period of the demand, and (4) controlling the size of the training sets. The bias-variance trade-off provides a theoretical understanding of when a strategy produces more accurate forecasts than other strategies. The study employs single-source-of-error state-space models, namely exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average, to produce forecasts. This study also assesses their performance relative to the seasonal-trend model. The findings show that, regardless of the strategies, using all observations is preferable to using post-disruption observations in terms of forecast accuracy. Using mixed-effects regression analysis, interpolating the interrupted demand that maintains the structures of the demand improves the forecast accuracy the most, even though the interpolating may introduce propagated errors. If a modeller decides to use only post-disruption data, they need to consider a trade-off between assuming the pre-disruption model structure the same as the post one or implementing automatic model selection with backcasting estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kandrika Fadhlan Pritularga (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: