Key result
Incident and sustained heart stress linked to a ~7% absolute increase in total CVD risk.
Why the study?
Heart stress status defined by longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations may improve risk assessment for CVD and mortality in older adults.
Does heart stress status based on longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations predict total cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in older adults without prior CVD?
Observational (n=8,454)
Does heart stress status based on longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations predict total cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in older adults without prior CVD?
Longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations defining heart stress status can improve risk stratification for cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Dr. Alexander argues how NT-proBNP could become a valuable component of wellness testing in older adults given its ability to identify low and potentially modifiable risk while also providing a measure of biologic aging.”
NT-proBNP trajectory may refine CVD and mortality risk assessment in older adults without prior disease; leaves open whether it guides interventions.
BACKGROUND: Age-specific elevation in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations, previously termed "heart stress (HS)," has been associated with adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. Yet, HS status, as defined by longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations, may improve risk assessment for CVD and mortality in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HS status on the basis of 3-year changes in NT-proBNP concentrations with risk for total CVD and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older adults free of prior CVD. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: The ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) trial and subsequent observational extension (ASPREE-XT). PARTICIPANTS: 8454 participants (mean age, 78.0 years at year 3; 52.9% women) without prior CVD who had NT-proBNP measured at trial enrollment and year 3. MEASUREMENTS: Heart stress status, based on changes in NT-proBNP concentrations from enrollment to year 3, was examined in 4 categories: persistently HS-free, HS remission, incident HS, or sustained HS. The 2 coprimary outcomes were total CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, coronary heart disease death, or heart failure hospitalization) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 818 CVD events and 1584 deaths occurred. At year 8, compared with the persistently HS-free category, the adjusted absolute risks (ARs) for total CVD were increased by 7.4% (95% CI, 4.8% to 10.0%) for incident HS and 6.7% (CI, 4.3% to 9.0%) for sustained HS; adjusted ARs were also increased for all-cause mortality by 6.1% (CI, 3.7% to 8.5%) for incident HS and 7.5% (CI, 5.2% to 9.8%) for sustained HS. The HS remission category had similar adjusted ARs to those of the persistently HS-free group. LIMITATION: Observational design and predominantly White participants. CONCLUSION: Heart stress status based on longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentration may improve risk stratification of CVD and mortality. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Community-dwelling older adults free of prior CVD (n=8,454). Incident or sustained heart stress (longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP) vs. Persistently heart stress-free was evaluated on Total CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, coronary heart disease death, or heart failure hospitalization) and all-cause mortality (Adjusted absolute risk increase 7.4%, 95% CI 4.8-10.0). Incident and sustained heart stress (longitudinal NT-proBNP increases) increased the absolute risk of total CVD by 7.4% (95% CI, 4.8-10.0%) and 6.7% (95% CI, 4.3-9.0%) compared to being HS-free.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: