This study explores the factors influencing the functionality of the CDCF Committee. Utilizing a qualitative research approach with a case study design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and a documentary review involving 31 key respondents, including CDCF Committee members, Head of Department, and councilors. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data supported by NVIVO software. Findings reveal that while the CDCF Committee's composition is perceived as inclusive, it suffers from biases and political interests that skew decision-making processes. Respondents noted that political influence and favoritism often undermine equitable fund distribution. Budgetary constraints were cited as a significant challenge, limiting the scope and impact of funded projects. Additionally, a lack of comprehensive understanding of CDCF guidelines among CDCF members and failure on adhering to committee meetings schedule hampers effective utilization of the funds. This study underscores the necessity for restructuring the CDCF Committee’s composition to mitigate biases, improving financial resources to better meet development needs, and enhancing training on CDCF guidelines to optimize committee performance. These insights aim to inform better management practices and policy adjustments to enhance the effectiveness of CDCF committees.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makombe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: