The integration of exogenous DNA into the genome of a mammalian cell would be expected'-despite l m-ited knowledge of the recombinatorial mechanisms-to have an intrinsic potential for generating change in the donor or host DNA sequences. The changes might entail tandem duplications, deletions, other rearrange-ments, such as inversions or translocations, or even base substitutions. When the recipient cell is the fertilized egg rather than a somatic ell, the consequences of uch a muta-tion may be far-reaching, especially if the change is deleterious. Not only can the new genotype be repli-cated and found in all somatic ells of the animal de-rived from that egg; it can be transmitted to the next generation through the germ cells. A mutation initially present in the heterozygous state could appear in the homozygous form of a percentage of progeny de-scended from a pair of heterozygotes. Thus, a trans-genic individual derived from an egg with integrated exogenous (proviral or recombinant) DNA would have at risk any cell type(s) in which the relevant genetic re-gion is ordinarily expressed, if the mutation is a domi-nant or codominant one, and could generate handi-capped or inviable homozygotes, if the mutation is recessive. There is abundant evidence that DNA that is trans-fected or injected, with or without viral sequences, into cultured mammalian somatic ells undergoes mutation at a high frequency, up to approximately 1 ~ per gene (Lebkowski et al. 1984; Miller et al. 1984; Mounts and Kelly 1984). The mutations are chiefly base substitu-tions and deletions in the donor DNA, but they also include insertions from the host genome. Cotrans-fected DNA species can themselves become covalently linked by homologous recombination or by blunt-end ligation, and may experience rearrangement (Wiglet et
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Covarrubias et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: