Key result
Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.63; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Data were limited on the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding in patients taking DOACs.
Does apixaban reduce post-polypectomy bleeding and thromboembolism compared to warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy?
Cohort
Yes
Does apixaban reduce post-polypectomy bleeding and thromboembolism compared to warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.39 (95% CI 0.24–0.63)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy, apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of post-polypectomy bleeding and thromboembolism compared to warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban.
Apixaban may be preferable to warfarin to lower bleeding risk in polypectomy patients; this cohort study leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: There were limited data on the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to evaluate the PPB and thromboembolic risks among DOAC and warfarin users in a population-based cohort. METHODS: We performed a territory-wide retrospective cohort study involving patients in Hong Kong from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received an oral anticoagulant and had undergone colonoscopy with polypectomy were identified. Propensity-score models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were developed for the warfarin-DOAC and between-DOAC comparisons. The primary outcome was clinically significant delayed PPB, defined as repeat colonoscopy requiring haemostasis within 30 days. The secondary outcomes were 30-day blood transfusion requirement and new thromboembolic event. RESULTS: Apixaban was associated with lower PPB risk than warfarin (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.63, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.77, adjusted p (ap)=0.035) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.72, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.48, ap=0.002) were associated with higher PPB risk than apixaban. In subgroup analysis, apixaban was associated with lower PPB risk in patients aged ≥70 years and patients with right-sided colonic polyps.For thromboembolic events, apixaban was associated with lower risk than warfarin (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.45, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06 to 6.41, ap=0.033) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.37, ap =0.013) were associated with higher thromboembolic risk than apixaban. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of PPB and thromboembolism than warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, particularly in older patients with right-sided polyps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Patients on oral anticoagulants undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy. Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Clinically significant delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (repeat colonoscopy requiring haemostasis within 30 days) (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.63, p=<0.001). Apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.24-0.63; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: