Why the study?
Does response dependent reinforcement prevent cognitive deficits in depressed and nondepressed elderly subjects?
Does response dependent reinforcement prevent cognitive deficits in depressed and nondepressed elderly subjects?
Depression may exacerbate fatigue effects in the elderly, and response-dependent reinforcement may prevent fatigue-caused deficits in short-term memory.
Response-dependent reinforcement may offset fatigue-related cognitive declines in elderly; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Sixty-six community-residing elderly (mean age = 72.5) were categorized as depressed (mean = 11.3) or nondepressed (mean = 3.9) based on Beck Depression Inventory scores. After a pre-test battery measuring short-term memory and crystallized/fluid intelligence, the subjects responded to a word association task, disguised as a test of interpersonal empathy, under response dependent or response independent reinforcement conditions, or were assigned to a no treatment control. A post-test battery of alternate forms followed. Four of seven measures showed significant pre- to post-test declines in performance. For two of these four, response dependent reinforcement prevented otherwise significant declines. With pre-test differences statistically controlled, depression produced significant post-test deficits in three measures. Response dependent reinforcement eliminated this depression deficit in one measure. The results indicate that depression may exacerbate fatigue effects for the elderly and response dependent reinforcement may prevent fatigue-caused deficits in short-term memory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennelly et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Experimental Aging Research