This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
By means of the ΔSCF and transition operator (TO) methods based on a recently developed INDO extension to the first transition metal series, the first ionization potentials of benzene—chromium tricarbonyl ( I ), cyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl ( II ), the iron—tricarbonyl complexes with trimethylenemethane ( III ), and cyclobutadiene ( IV ) have been calculated and compared with experimental data. It is shown that the electronic structure of I to IV can be rationalized by Hoffmann's fragment approach in both the ground state and the cationic hole states. Within the series I—IV there are remarkable energy differences in the ground state for MOs derived from the 1 a 1 and 1 e orbitals of the M(CO) 3 fragment. The observation that only one band is associated with the ionization events from MOs predominantly localized at the metal site is traced back to large relaxation effects. In the cationic hole states the split of the M(CO) 3 fragment orbitals 1 a 1 and 1 e is minute in all four compounds.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böhm et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: