The supraperiosteal-subSMAS lifting technique, which has been performed since 1985, for the rejuvenation of the upper two-thirds of the face is described, and the results obtained in a series of 128 cases treated, emphasizing the attainment of an effective rejuvenation together with a minimum of complications and undesired effects is presented. A discussion on the two dissection planes (supraperiosteal-subSMAS versus subperiosteal) used most commonly in the lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face is presented. From an anatomohistophysiologic basis, the tissue manipulations that the two techniques mandate are discussed and evaluated. Based on these facts, the supraperiosteal-subSMAS technique is the most logical physiologically, because it produces less tissue trauma, which leads to fewer complications and a more rapid recovery to a normal social life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plaza et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: