Key result
Genome-wide association studies have identified many genetic variants with small effects on coronary heart disease risk, though their clinical utility and translational applications remain uncertain.
Recent advances in genomic science have identified numerous genetic variants associated with coronary heart disease, though their clinical utility and translational applications remain areas of active investigation.
Offers no immediate change to CHD risk stratification or management; leaves open whether polygenic scores will prove clinically actionable.
BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading cause of death worldwide, yet many areas of its pathogenesis remain unknown or poorly understood, leaving potential for novel preventive and therapeutic interventions. Recent major advances in genomic science and technology have opened new avenues of investigation in the pathogenesis of CHD, some of which are leading to clinical translation. SOURCES OF DATA: The published literature in CHD genetics has burgeoned in the last 5 years with the reporting of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and many other findings. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Identification of many genetic variants with small effects on CHD risk has been a common finding. These have included several predicted loci, such as those involved in conventional CHD risk factors (e.g. plasma lipids) and many novel loci, where their mechanism of action is unclear. The need for large, collaborative approaches to research has also become clear and is now an accepted modus operandi. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The clinical utility of novel GWAS findings remains uncertain. In particular, the relative contribution of common variants of modest effect and rare variants of larger effects to risk of CHD or response to drugs is unclear. GROWING POINTS: As a greater number of larger GWASs are conducted in CHD and its related phenotypes, much effort is being made to find translational applications for their findings. Therapeutics, prediction and pathology are major areas of research endeavour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swerdlow et al. (2012) conducted a review in Coronary heart disease. Genetic variants was evaluated. Genome-wide association studies have identified many genetic variants with small effects on coronary heart disease risk, though their clinical utility and translational applications remain uncertain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: