Comparative study reveals distinct immune evasion mechanisms in AFP-producing gastric carcinoma, highlighting novel targets for immunotherapy.
Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma (AFPGC) is an aggressive subtype of gastric cancer characterized by a primitive cellular phenotype and poor prognosis. The tumor immunology of AFPGC remains largely unexplored. Given its embryonic-like properties, AFPGC is hypothesized to employ distinct immune evasion strategies, with the oncofetal protein human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G-a key mediator of maternal-fetal immune tolerance-likely playing a pivotal role. To test this, we assessed the expression of HLA-G, along with other key immune evasion markers, including HLA class I (HLA-I) deficiency and PD-L1 expression, in 39 cases of AFPGC, and compared them with those of 44 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive, 57 microsatellite instability (MSI), 54 intestinal-type, and 45 diffuse-type gastric carcinomas. HLA-G expression was significantly higher in AFPGCs (71%) than in other subtypes (7-28%; P < 0.001). HLA-I deficiency (≥ 1% of tumor cells) was most prevalent in AFPGC (69%), followed by MSI tumors (56%), with lower rates in other subtypes (22-29%). PD-L1 positivity (combined positive score ≥ 5) was observed in 41% of AFPGCs, lower than in EBV-positive (77%) and MSI tumors (44%), but higher than in intestinal-type (13%) and diffuse-type (9%) carcinomas. Furthermore, CD8-positive T-cell infiltration was found to be lowest in AFPGC compared to the other subtypes. These findings suggest that AFPGC employs multiple immune evasion mechanisms, notably through increased HLA-G expression and HLA-I deficiency, likely linked to its primitive cellular phenotype and reactivation of immunogenic oncofetal antigens. Such immune evasion features may underlie the aggressiveness of AFPGC and present promising targets for immunotherapeutic interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamazawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: