Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 2022Nature GeneticsOpen Access

Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MNMichel G. NivardTMTim MorrisAHAilin Falkmo Hansen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Nivard et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a859f7235bc0eada8d5a869https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data2018 · 10,133 citations
  2. 2Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group2020 · 505 citations
  3. 3Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases2019 · 77 citations
  4. 4Polygenic adaptation on height is overestimated due to uncorrected stratification in genome-wide association studies2019 · 413 citations
  5. 5Assortative mating for human height: A meta‐analysis2016 · 104 citations