This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Traditional clinical microbiology-based diagnostic tests rely on targeted methods that can detect only one to a few preselected organisms or slow, culture-based methods. Although widely used today, these methods have several limitations, resulting in rates of cases of an unknown etiology of infection of >50% for several disease types. Massive developments in sequencing technologies have made it possible to apply metagenomic methods to clinical diagnostics, but current offerings are limited to a specific disease type or sequencer workflow and/or require laboratory-specific controls. The limitations associated with current clinical metagenomic offerings result from the fact that the backend bioinformatic pipelines are optimized for the specific parameters described above, resulting in an excess of unmaintained, redundant, and niche tools that lack standardization and explainable outputs. In this paper, we demonstrate that UltraSEQ uses a novel, information-based approach that enables accurate, evidence-based predictions for diagnosis as well as the functional characterization of a sample.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gemler et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: