Key result
Two Tibetan EV-C96 strains exhibited distinct cell tropisms and genetic variability, including an 18-nucleotide deletion in the 5'-UTR of one strain that may impair its ability to produce cytopathic effects.
Why the study?
Enterovirus C96 is a newly named enterovirus species C type, prompting the study to characterize the genomic and phenotypic features of two strains from the Tibet Autonomous Region of China.
EV-C96 strains from Tibet support expanded surveillance; leaves open clinical impact and spread.
BACKGROUND: Enterovirus C96 (EV-C96) is a newly named type of enterovirus belonging to species C, and the prototype strain (BAN00-10488) was firstly isolated in 2000 from a stool specimen of a patient with acute flaccid paralysis in Bangladesh. In this study, we report the genomic and phenotypic characteristics of two EV-C96 strains isolated from individuals from the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. METHODS: Human rhabdomyosarcoma (RD), human laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma (HEp-2), and human cervical cancer (Hela) cells were infected with the Tibet EV-C96 strains, and enterovirus RNA in the cell culture was detected with a real time RT-PCR-based enterovirus screening method. The temperature sensitivity of Tibet EV-C96 strains were assayed on a monolayer of RD cells in 24-well plates. Full-length genome sequencing was performed by a 'primer-walking' strategy, and the evolutionary history of EV-C96 was studied by maximum likelihood analysis. RESULTS: Strain 2005-T49 grew in all three kinds of cells, and it was not temperature sensitive. In contrast, none of the three cells produced CPE for strain 2012-94H. Phylogenetic analysis of the two Tibetan viruses, other EV-C96 strains, and EV-C prototypes showed that EV-C96 strains were grouped into three clusters (Cluster1-3) based on their VP1 sequences, which may represent three genotypes. Phylogenetic trees based on the P2 and P3 regions highlighted the difference between Chinese EV-C96 strains and the EV-C96 prototype strain BAN-10488. All Chinese strains formed a cluster separate from BAN-10488, which clustered with CV-A1/CV-A22/CV-A19. CONCLUSIONS: There is genetic variability between EV-C96 strains which suggest that at least few genetic lineages co-exist and there has been some degree of circulation in different geographical regions for some time. Some recombination events must have occurred during EV-C96 evolution as EV-C96 isolates cluster with different EV-C prototype strains in phylogenetic trees in different genomic regions. However, recombination does not seem to have occurred frequently as EV-C96 isolates from different years and locations appear to cluster together in all genomic regions analysed. These findings expand the understanding of the characterization of EV-C96 and are meaningful for the surveillance of the virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2019) studied Enterovirus C96 infection (n=2). Enterovirus C96 strains (2005-T49 and 2012-94H) vs. Prototype EV-C96 strain BAN00-10488 and other EV-C strains was evaluated on Genomic and phenotypic characteristics. Two Tibetan EV-C96 strains exhibited distinct cell tropisms and genetic variability, including an 18-nucleotide deletion in the 5'-UTR of one strain that may impair its ability to produce cytopathic effects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: