Relative D(Ti-R)rel have been measured previously for (silox)2(tBu3SiNH)TiR (1-R). Pauling and Matcha equations of D(MR) that contain elements of electronegativity, D(MM), D(HH) and D(RH) were used to estimate absolute D(TiR) in 1 with minimal success. The electronegativity approaches need a variety of substituents with a wide spread in χR, hence examination of 1-H and 1-R are heavily and incorrectly weighted by D(TiH)-D(TiR). Absolute D(TiR) generated in this manner approach those of related systems only when χXTi = 2.9, a value shown to be irrational. Drago's ECT parameters were used in the hope that the three parameter fit would compensate for inadequacies in electronegativity-based methods. The limited set of alkyl parameters available, and a lack of distinguishing parameters that can significantly differentiate one alkyl from another, render this potentially useful method imprecise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: