Titanium dioxide and vanadium-doped titanium dioxide prepared by the sol−gel method showed a quantum-size effect in the form of a 0.19 eV blue shift in the band gap energy compared to bulk TiO 2 . The presence of vanadium as a dopant did not affect the band gap energy of TiO 2 . However, concentrations of this dopant up to 1% atom ratio increased the pH of the isoelectric point (IEP) above the value of 5.8 found for pure TiO 2 . When the vanadium concentration surpassed 1%, the IEP began to decrease, dropping below the IEP of pure TiO 2 at dopant concentrations greater than ca. 2%. Thin-film electrodes fabricated from TiO 2 and V-doped TiO 2 coated on titanium foil showed different performances in degrading formic acid and oxalic acid depending on the V content in the catalyst. Using the 5% V-doped TiO 2 electrode, 82% of TOC was removed from an aqueous solution containing oxalic acid (25 mg L -1 in C) against 74% removed by the pure TiO 2 thin-film electrode in 1 h. In degrading formic acid, 79% of TOC was removed using the 1% V-doped photoelectrode against 77% removed using the plain TiO 2 in 1 h. Additionally, the influence of the bias potential on photoelectrocatalytic oxidation using these thin-film electrodes is discussed as well as the effect of metal doping on the flat band potential of the electrodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sene et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: