Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chloroquine (CQ) is a relatively inexpensive drug for treatment of malaria. If efficacy of CQ is still assumed, then it should be indicated in malaria treatment policies as the drug of choice for uncomplicated Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic countries with resource constraints. The objective of this review is to summarize the existing evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of CQ in treating patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria in endemic countries. We searched online data bases (PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library) and the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Fifteen randomized controlled trials (n=6215) assessing the relative efficacy and safety of CQ for treatment of uncomplicated P. vivax malaria were included. CQ monotherapy was compared to CQ plus primaquine (PQ), artemisinin/artemether, artemisinin based combination therapy, quinine, CQ plus tafenoquine, chlorguanil plus dapsone, azithromycin, or placebo. Treatment efficacy was not significantly different between the CQ monotherapy group and that of the CQ with PQ 14 day group at 28 day follow-up (55/711, 7.7% vs 35/712, 4.9%; P=0.16). Evidence from the trials identified for this review draw a fairly clear conclusion about the relative efficacy and safety of CQ for treating uncomplicated P. vivax malaria infection. However, further research in this field with well powered, randomized, non-inferiority design, using the standardized protocol is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naing et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: