Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Partial hydrolysis reactions of the solvated [TiCl5(MeCN)]– anion and of the adduct TiCl4·2MeCN gave the µ-oxo-dititanium anion [{TiCl4(MeCN)}2(µ-O)]2– and the neutral tetranuclear µ-oxo compound [{TiCl2(MeCN)2(µ-O)}4], respectively, as established by X-ray crystallographic studies. Crystals of [Mg(MeCN)6][{TiCl4(MeCN)}2(µ-O)]·4MeCN 1 are monoclinic, space group P21/n, a= 14.777(6), b= 14.603(6), c= 21.214(10)Å, β= 105.3(1)°. The structure contains discrete octahedral [Mg(MeCN)6]2+cations, [{TiCl4(MeCN)}2(µ-O)]2– anions and solvent (MeCN) molecules. Crystals of [{TiCl2(MeCN)2(µ-O)}4]·2MeCN 2 are orthorhombic, space group P212121a= 12.165(6), b= 12.367(6), c= 27.927(11)Å. The structure contains discrete [{TiCl2(MeCN)2(µ-O)}4] units and solvent (MeCN) molecules. In 1 both titanium atoms have an octahedral environment. The Ti–O–Ti bridge is approximately linear [174.7(3)°] with equivalent Ti–O distances of 1.783(4) and 1.764(4)Å. By contrast in 2 there are four Ti–O–Ti bridges but in each case the two Ti–O distances are significantly different with mean values of 1.668,1.954 Å.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willey et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: