Key result
Vernakalant significantly increased cardioversion within 90 minutes compared with controls in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (RR 8.4; 95% CI 4.4-16.3; P<.00001).
Why the study?
Does vernakalant infusion improve cardioversion within 90 minutes in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to placebo or other antiarrhythmic drugs?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,099)
Does vernakalant infusion improve cardioversion within 90 minutes in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to placebo or other antiarrhythmic drugs?
Relative Risk: 8.4 (95% CI 4.4–16.3)
p-value: p=<.00001
Vernakalant infusion is highly effective for rapid cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation compared to placebo or other antiarrhythmics, though safety concerns remain from an unpublished discontinued trial.
Supports vernakalant for rapid cardioversion in recent-onset AF; confirms high efficacy but safety concerns persist from prior trials.
Vernakalant is an emergent antiarrhythmic drug that, in preclinical studies, has demonstrated high efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm and safety in patients with rapid recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vernakalant for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. PubMed, EMBASE, Clinical Trials Registry, and European Medicines Agency public reports were searched for randomized clinical trials, until May 2011, of vernakalant compared with controls (placebo/other antiarrhythmic drug) in enrolled patients with high ventricular rate atrial fibrillation. Five randomized trials that met inclusion criteria enrolled a total of 1099 patients. Among these, 810 had recent-onset atrial fibrillation. When compared with controls (placebo/other oral antiarrhythmic drugs), vernakalant was associated with a significant increase in cardioversion within 90 minutes from drug infusion (relative risk, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.4-16.3; P < .00001). Compared with controls, vernakalant was not associated with a significant difference in serious adverse events (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.4; P = .64). The authors conclude that compared with controls, vernakalant is effective and safe for rapidly converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Questions remain surrounding safety because 1 unpublished trial was discontinued for this reason. Further cost-effective analysis and comparison with other antiarrhythmic agents, such as class I antiarrhythmic agents, should be investigated, especially in the emergency department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buccelletti et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis in Recent-onset atrial fibrillation (n=1,099). Vernakalant vs. Controls (placebo or other antiarrhythmic drug) was evaluated on Cardioversion within 90 minutes from drug infusion (RR 8.4, 95% CI 4.4-16.3, p=<.00001). Vernakalant significantly increased cardioversion within 90 minutes compared with controls in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation (RR 8.4; 95% CI 4.4-16.3; P<.00001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: